[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
prosauropod growth & metabolics
That at least some prosauropods experienced reptilian growth as demonstrated
by Sander & Klein in Nature is not surprising. Basal dinosaurs - prosauropods
and pretridactyl theropods as well as protodinosaurs - retained small ilia
that were incapable of anchoring the very large thigh muscles present on more
derived dinosaurs, including birds, as well as mammals with large ilial plates
(this is discussed in DA etc). The modest leg muscles of basal dinosaurs
indicates they lacked the high aerobic exercise capacity typical of birds and
most
mammals. On the other hand their long, erect legs and the presence of
nonreptilian growth in some basal theropods and prosauropods indicates that
their
energetics were not entirely reptilian either, probably being more aerobically
capable than any modern reptile. Instead brevischian dinosaurs appear to have
possessed an intermediate metabolic/growth system that went extinct in the
early
Jurassic as the more advanced, bigger hipped longoschian dinosaurs became more
energetic and bird/mammal-like.
What is interesting about the S&K paper is how they use the terms ecto and
endotherm. When they suggest that Plateosaurus was an ectotherm is seems
doubtful that they really mean it was largely dependent upon external heat as
the
word actually means. Instead they appear to be denying that it had the well
developed thermorgulatory system present in birds and mammals, which is
probably
correct but in no way means that the first dinosaurs were ectotherms. Indeed
S&K
soon say that plateosaurs were at the initial stage of endothermy, which is
likely correct in that they were probably generating most body heat internally.
Meanwhile, Feduccia in a commentary on the new, advanced Early Cretaceous
wading bird from China says it was an endotherm, implying that it was a fully
avian endotherm, even though more basal birds almost certainly were endotherms
that made most of their body heat internally even if they lacked the entire
avian suite of thermorgulatory adaptations.
The need for an overhaul of the energetic physiological terminology is
reinforced.
G Paul