Re: new ref: GALTON. 2005

[Rob Gay <rob@dinodomain.com>]

It sounds like there's more to suggest sauropod than stegosaur, based on that. 
Be interesting to see the full paper though.
Rob

Paleontology Volunteer
Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument
http://dinodomain.com

On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:05 , David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at> sent:

>> The Aust shafts are truly columnar, agreeing with those of stegosaurs in
>> the apparent lack of a prominent fourth trochanter and of the associated
>> posteromedial depression, structures which are prominent in sauropods.
>> These two shafts, with estimated femoral lengths of about 1000-1100 mm,
>> are tentatively referred to the Stegosauria so stegosaurs probably
>> reached a large size in the Upper Triassic
>
>:-o
>
>Can Galton be serious?!?
>
>Anyway, I'll be able to get that paper in a few weeks...
>
>-- 
>Lust, ein paar Euro nebenbei zu verdienen? Ohne Kosten, ohne Risiko!
>Satte Provisionen für GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner
>