[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Tectonic News



30 million years ago would be pretty recent by rifting standards. Most failed rifts became inactive much longer ago.

Yours,
Dora Smith
Austin, TX
villandra@austin.rr.com



Phil Bigelow wrote:

On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 08:58:12 -0500 "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr."
<tholtz@geol.umd.edu> writes:


From: Dora Smith [mailto:villandra@austin.rr.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 6:16 PM

I have a question, though. How old is the Rift Valley?





Neogene, but I'm not sure of more than that. Some hunting in the tectonic and stratigraphic lit for East Africa would give you the
answer, though.



Some sections in the Awash area contain late Middle Miocene vertebrate-bearing sediments (~ 11 mya), meaning that sediment was infilling a large depression at that time. Also meaning that this particular depression predates the beginning of the rifting process. But IIRC, there are basalts in the area, suspected of being rift basalts, that are dated as Oligocene. (~ 30 mya). So the earliest glints of the rift process may be as old as Paleogene (mafic-rich volcanic activity usually precedes the valley-forming block faulting). At the other end of the time scale, Mount Kilimanjaro is a rift-related composite volcano of Plio-Pleistocene age.