[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: A Critical Re-examination of Theropod Phylogenetics

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: A Critical Re-examination of Theropod Phylogenetics
From: Nick Gardner <nick.gardner@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 06:16:56 -0400
In-reply-to: <20050823080106.MIBU23288.aamta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@newlaptop>
References: <8b9d0ef505082221161d5c7665@mail.gmail.com> <20050823080106.MIBU23288.aamta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@newlaptop>
Reply-to: nick.gardner@gmail.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

Don't be a silly boy, all postcranial characters are clearly useless.
Haven't you ever seen any ornithischian analyses? ;)

Nick Gardner

On 8/23/05, John Hunt <john.bass@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> 
> Nick,
> 
> What is your definition of silly post cranial characters?  Some hand and
> foot characters are particularly diagnostic.  Did you exclude the
> semi-lunate carpal, avimetatarsus etc?
> 
> John
> 
>

References:
- A Critical Re-examination of Theropod Phylogenetics
  - From: Nick Gardner <nick.gardner@gmail.com>
- RE: A Critical Re-examination of Theropod Phylogenetics
  - From: John Hunt <john.bass@ntlworld.com>

Prev by Date: RE: A Critical Re-examination of Theropod Phylogenetics
Next by Date: Re: A Critical Re-examination of Theropod Phylogenetics
Previous by thread: RE: A Critical Re-examination of Theropod Phylogenetics
Next by thread: Re: A Critical Re-examination of Theropod Phylogenetics
Indexes: