RE: What group has the most work that needs to be done?

[Ken.Carpenter@dmns.org]

Hmm. OK, missed those, but not on cladograms in pachy or ceratopsian
chapters. I still stand by my statement. The group is too weakly
supported.
Ken


 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu [mailto:owner-dinosaur@usc.edu] 
> On Behalf Of Mickey Mortimer
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 8:22 PM
> To: dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: Re: What group has the most work that needs to be done?
> 
> Ken Carpenter wrote-
> 
> > Personally, I don't believe in this group (Maginocephalia). The 
> > characters uniting ceratopsians and pachycephalosaurs are  
> too few. I 
> > see that Dinosauria II has abandoned this artificial group.
> 
> Wha?  Dinosauria II endorses Marginocephalia in the 
> Ornithischia, Pachycephalosauria and Basal Ceratopsia chapters.
> 
> Mickey Mortimer
> Undergraduate, Earth and Space Sciences
> University of Washington
> The Theropod Database - 
> http://students.washington.edu/eoraptor/Home.html
>