[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: What group has the most work that needs to be done?
> Are maginocephalians closer to Iguanodon than is
> Hypsilophodon? Maybe. Are the Middle Jurassic
> "hypsilophodontians" actually ornithopods? Hard to say at present.
Personally, I don't believe in this group (Maginocephalia). The
characters uniting ceratopsians and pachycephalosaurs are too few. I
see that Dinosauria II has abandoned this artificial group.
Kenneth Carpenter, Ph.D.
Curator of Lower Vertebrate Paleontology
and Chief Preparator
Department of Earth Sciences
Denver Museum of Nature & Science
2001 Colorado Blvd.
Denver, CO 80205 USA
Ken.Carpenter@DMNS.org
ph: 303-370-6392/ or 6403
fx: 303-331-6492
for PDFs of my reprints, info about the Cedar Mtn. Project, etc. see:
https://scientists.dmns.org/sites/kencarpenter/default.aspx
for fun, see also:
http://dino.lm.com/artists/display.php?name=Kcarpenter
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu [mailto:owner-dinosaur@usc.edu]
> On Behalf Of Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 2:32 PM
> To: nygdan@yahoo.com; dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: RE: What group has the most work that needs to be done?
>
> > From: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu
> [mailto:owner-dinosaur@usc.edu]On Behalf
> > Of Robert J. Schenck
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 3:04 PM
> > To: dinosaur@usc.edu
> > Subject: What group has the most work that needs to be done?
> >
> >
> > What group of dinosaurs has the most work that needs to be done on
> > them, and how much of that need is based on lack of workers versus
> > lack of specimins?
> >
> > For example, theropods receive a lot of attention, and
> there's been a
> > lot of recent discoveries that seem to be shaking things up
> (just in
> > the last year or so, let alone the crazy chinese feathered
> specimins
> > from around the millenium).
> >
> > But what other groups can use a lot of work and show a lot
> of promise
> > in your opinions?
> > Hadrosaurs? Prosauropods? Armoured Dinosaurs in general?
>
> Prosauropods are getting a good working over at SVP this
> year! There's a special symposium on there.
>
> Hadrosaurs: I'd really like to see a good species-level
> analysis simultaneously using the North American and Asian
> forms (and the stragglers elsewhere) from both
> "Hadrosaurinae" and Lambeosaurinae. Some recent papers have
> suggested that some or many of the traditional "hadroaurines"
> may be closer to lambeosaurines than to such taxa as
> Edmontosaurus. And establishing the species-level
> relationships of (among others) Edmontosaurus regalis,
> Anatosaurus annectens, Anatotitan copei, and Shantungosaurus
> giganteus (or is it all Edmontosaurus?) or Hypacrosaurus
> altirhinus, Nipponosaurus (?= Hypacrosaurus) sachalinensis,
> Olorotitan arharensis, "Hypacrosaurus" stebingeri, and
> Corythosaurus casuarius.
>
> But I would say the BIG task that needs doing (and is being
> done, but at least two different workers) is testing the
> current consensus (i.e., the Sereno 1986) relationships among
> Ornithischia as a whole. No longer are we stuck using single
> multi-taxon OTUs because of the slow speed of the software
> and hardware; so let's start seeing the simultaneous analysis
> of 80 or 100 taxa and hundreds of characters.
>
> Are maginocephalians closer to Iguanodon than is
> Hypsilophodon? Maybe. Are the Middle Jurassic
> "hypsilophodontians" actually ornithopods? Hard to say at present.
>
> So if dino-phylogenetics is what you are after, this is
> probably the big frontier.
>
> Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
> Vertebrate Paleontologist
> Department of Geology Director, Earth, Life & Time Program
> University of Maryland College Park Scholars
> Mailing Address:
> Building 237, Room 1117
> College Park, MD 20742
>
> http://www.geol.umd.edu/~tholtz/
> http://www.geol.umd.edu/~jmerck/eltsite
> Phone: 301-405-4084 Email: tholtz@geol.umd.edu
> Fax (Geol): 301-314-9661 Fax (CPS-ELT): 301-405-0796
>
>