[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Fruitafossor

To: twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: *Fruitafossor*
From: Nick Pharris <npharris@umich.edu>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:41:40 -0400
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <BAY101-F3603CC8C13149E25DBCD86983B0@phx.gbl>
References: <BAY101-F3603CC8C13149E25DBCD86983B0@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: npharris@umich.edu
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

Quoting Tim Williams <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com>:

> The connection
> between palaeonodonts, xenarthrans and pholidotes is similarly unresolved.

Well, molecular phylogenies are pretty consistent in placing Pholidota near
Carnivora and Xenarthra a long way away from either of those.

Nick Pharris
Ph.D. Candidate
Department of Linguistics
University of Michigan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: *Fruitafossor*
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

References:
- Re: *Fruitafossor*
  - From: Tim Williams <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com>