[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Largest Dinosaurs
> Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 13:52:22 EDT
> From: AAAAM49@aol.com
>
> Thanks, Mike. Are you familiar with any recent discoveries. I know
> some on that list are questioned due to the fossil no longer
> existing or whether it is animallian at all.
There are various rumours and undescribed sauropods that may or may
not be bigger than anything that's been formally described yet, but I
think the biggest ones are pretty much all mentioned (if briefly) in
the FAQ entry.
The strongest contenders for biggest sauropod that we have _any_ real
evidence of if probably _Amphicoelias fragillimus_, which is also a
classic tale of tragedy. Only one specimen has ever been found, and
all that was found of that was the neural arch (top half) of a dorsal
(back) vertebra. That portion closely resembles the corresponding
bones in diplodocoids such as _Diplodocus_ and _Amphicoelias_, and
scaling from the size of the better known bones suggests a length of
something in the range 50-60m. The tragedy is that this sole specimen
was lost when Cope's collection was moved; so all that remains is a
sketchily drawn figure. One has to wonder whether Cope made the whole
thing up in order to annoy Marsh.
A likely contender to take the crown in the future is
_Bruhathkayosaurus_, which is being studied by Sankar Chatterjee
(although I get the sense that he's frittering his valuable time away
on birds and other such rubbish when he ought to be getting on with
important sauropod work). This specimen includes a 3m femur, which is
pretty damned colossal. It's clearly not in great condition: it has
been identified at various times as a theropod femur and as a tree
trunk(!) but Chatterjee is apparently now quite sure that it is indeed
a titanosaur femur. When he's going to publish -- if ever -- I really
don't know. But there's every indication that when he does, it'll be
a description of an animal bigger than anything yet published.
> I know there was a recent find in Spain of a Paralititan like
> titanosaur that was 80-100 ton range.
I have seen several very contradictory reports on this specimen, plus
a photo of its humerus that looks like nothing I've seen before. I'll
be fascinated to see that they have to say about it when it's
published, but this one -- even more than others -- seems like
unfruitful ground for speculation at the moment.
> I also believe dig that unearthed Paralititan may contain a fossil
> to a dinosaur much larger that it.
Sorry, I couldn't make that out. I am pretty certain the expedition
that discovered _Paralititan_ didn't find anything even bigger,
though. Josh Smith, who led that expedition, is a long-time list
member and would very likely have said something here if so.
> I recently read something on anew discovery in Argentina the last 12
> months on a dinosaur that may be larger than Argentinosaurus. Have
> you heard or seen anything on these.
I've seen bits and pieces drifting by on this one. It's strange
animal, for sure. According to the brief article at
http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/dinosaurs/news/Biggestargentina.shtml
the femur is apparently about two meters long. While that's certainly
big, it's not outrageous for a sauropod. But apparently a cervical
(neck) vertebra is about 1.20m _tall_, which is a crazy size.
Unfortunately, those are the only measurements given, so it's not
possible to say whether this is an absurdly huge neck, or merely a
bizarrely proportioned one. The length estimate of 48-51m (which you
shouldn't take _at all_ seriously, BTW) suggests that the cervical
vert that they're working from is _probably_ pretty damned long, too.
BUT the standard caution applies: wait for the paper. (I know it's
frustrating. Believe me, I am _much_ more frusatrated than you are
about this!)
_/|_ _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ Tom Holtz's rule of dinosaur restorations: if you can't fit
the skeleton inside the model, the model is wrong.
--
Listen to free demos of soundtrack music for film, TV and radio
http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/soundtrack/