Mickey Mortimer wrote:
Yates should be getting Plateosauravus out as a valid genus soon (http://dml.cmnh.org/2003Jul/msg00121.html), and there are a couple other prior nomina dubia to be redescribed in the future as well.
David Marjanovic wrote:
> and I believe the relation was grandparent/grandchild, not > parent/child; however I have not at my fingertips THAT documentation.
Weren't they uncle and nephew?
Tim