[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: pliny maior et minor

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: pliny maior et minor
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 23:48:23 +0100
References: <20041113222145.26842.qmail@web40501.mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

Ah, Secundus is the cognomen. That explains it.

and I believe the relation was grandparent/grandchild, not
parent/child; however I have not at my fingertips THAT documentation.


Weren't they uncle and nephew?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pliny maior et minor
  - From: Eric Allen <erallen@yahoo.com>
- Re: pliny maior et minor
  - From: Gautam Majumdar <gmajumdar@freeuk.com>

References:
- pliny maior et minor
  - From: Mar Qos Aker <marqosaker@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Coelurosauravus: glider? or bluffer?
Next by Date: Re: pliny maior et minor
Previous by thread: pliny maior et minor
Next by thread: Re: pliny maior et minor
Indexes: