[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Geological timescale

To: tholtz@geol.umd.edu
Subject: RE: Geological timescale
From: Nick Pharris <npharris@umich.edu>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 14:05:14 -0400
Cc: bigelowp@juno.com, dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <NDBBIAJHGJBHMGNKDFAHIEBEHCAA.tholtz@geol.umd.edu>
References: <NDBBIAJHGJBHMGNKDFAHIEBEHCAA.tholtz@geol.umd.edu>
Reply-to: npharris@umich.edu
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

Quoting "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@geol.umd.edu>:

> A condensation of the forthcoming Geologic Timescale 2004 can be found here:
> http://www.stratigraphy.org/scale04.pdf

So have we seen the last of Tertiary and Quaternary?  I notice both the abstract
above and the _Nature_ bit show only Pal(a)eogene and Neogene, with the
Quaternary sunk into the latter.

Nick Pharris
Department of Linguistics
University of Michigan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Geological timescale
  - From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

References:
- RE: Geological timescale
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@geol.umd.edu>

Prev by Date: problem with interpretation of models in avian phylogeny
Next by Date: Re: problem with interpretation of models in avian phylogeny
Previous by thread: RE: Geological timescale
Next by thread: Re: Geological timescale
Indexes: