Re: Rapator,the giant alvarezsaur

["Eric Martichuski" <herewiss13@hotmail.com>]

> From: Tim Williamson
> But what was this "function"?  If the forelimbs did regain function after a 
> period of atrophication, >why did they remain so small?

Probably because claws are easier to adapt than bones.  They don't have any 
surrounding musculature or circulatory system, you're really just tinkering 
with a cuticle.  They're more cost effective too in terms of material 
(keratin vs. bone, blood, etc.).  So if claws can be adapted to the given 
task more quickly, they ought to reach optimum function before selection 
really starts working on bone et, al.

If you need "sharp points two feet away from the body" does it really matter 
how they get there?

;-)

Sound plausible?

Eric
______________________________________________________________________
"There is no other wisdom,
And no other hope for us
But that we grow wise. -- Diane Duane
______________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® 
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963