[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: KT or KPg

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: KT or KPg
From: "Richard W. Travsky" <rtravsky@uwyo.edu>
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 22:41:19 -0600 (MDT)
In-reply-to: <BAY2-DAV61EwwSm3olw00000ba8@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: rtravsky@uwyo.edu
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, Thomas de Wilde wrote:
> KT sounds alot better than KPg, why don't we keep it as a "nomen
> conservandum",to say so

Watch (or rather "listen"), KPg is going to get pronounced "Kay Pig"...

References:
- KT or KPg
  - From: Thomas de Wilde <jedimr_thomas@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Rugops, a scavenger?
Next by Date: Sedimentary Geology: Special Issue on Morrison Paleoecology
Previous by thread: KT or KPg
Next by thread: Sedimentary Geology: Special Issue on Morrison Paleoecology
Indexes: