[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

"Dino 'survival' claim disputed"

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: "Dino 'survival' claim disputed"
From: MKIRKALDY@aol.com
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 11:38:06 -0500
Reply-to: MKIRKALDY@aol.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

By Paul Rincon, BBC News Online science  
Thursday, 5 February, 2004, 10:31 GMT  

"Convention dictates dinosaurs were extinct before the Tertiary.  The idea that 
dinosaurs survived for some time after the asteroid impact blamed for wiping 
them out sixty-five million years ago has been dealt a blow."

"Dinosaur egg fragments dug out of rocks in China seem to postdate the dramatic 
extinction event popularly believed to have extinguished the creatures."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3458651.stm

Mary

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Dino 'survival' claim disputed"
  - From: "James R. Cunningham" <jrccea@bellsouth.net>
- Re: "Dino 'survival' claim disputed"
  - From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: grudge match we all were not looking for
Next by Date: RE: Charging Triceratops (Behavior Conjecture Alert!)
Previous by thread: Re: grudge match we all were not looking for
Next by thread: Re: "Dino 'survival' claim disputed"
Indexes: