Novas et al. say it probably belongs to
Lametasaurus, which they believe may be a senior synonym of Rajasaurus.
The holotype (or should that be 'lectotype'?) of _Lametasaurus_ comprises
the numerous scutes that were found in association with the theropod
material, following Walker (1964). The genus _Lametasaurus_ (like
_Dynamosaurus_) was originally based on a mixture of theropod material and
armor fragments erroneously thought to pertain to the same taxon. Walker
retained the scutes (and nothing else) in the genus _Lametasaurus_, so the
theropod material is without a name. Thus, _Lametasaurus_ cannot trump
_Rajasaurus_.