[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Cretaceous taeniodont

To: John Bois <jbois@umd5.umd.edu>, dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
From: "James R. Cunningham" <jrccea@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 11:43:33 -0700
References: <BAY1-F594sCDv6suiqq00033251@hotmail.com> <Pine.OSF.4.51.0404090933350.14339@holmes.umd.edu> <4076BCB5.978826C5@bellsouth.net>
Reply-to: jrccea@bellsouth.net
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

John Bois wrote:

> Please forgive boorish post.  What I meant to say was that as JimC says,
> data is data.  The data at the big end of the scale are
> insignificant.  Representing them on log scale makes it appear
> significant.

No it doesn't.  It just presents them in a visually different format.
Jim
P.S.  Your post wasn't boorish.  I took it to mean that you agreed with me.

References:
- Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
  - From: "Eric Martichuski" <herewiss13@hotmail.com>
- Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
  - From: John Bois <jbois@umd5.umd.edu>
- Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
  - From: "James R. Cunningham" <jrccea@bellsouth.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
Next by Date: Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
Previous by thread: Value of large size?
Next by thread: Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
Indexes: