[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Details on 2002 Part 3 at last!

> Now to go about informing those who requested "Mortimer, 2004.
> A phylogeny of Neotetanurae" that such a paper won't exist for a
> few years at least. Now THAT should have been an obvious fake.
> I mean, 100 taxa?  I already have 158.

Oh crap... did I really write 100... :-]

> And why would I use Archaeopterygiformes instead of
> Deinonychosauria?

Looks better. Much better. IMHO.