[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Feduccia Reviews Paul's DOTA, Comments
> The latter has perhaps the worst cladistic analysis I've seen.
May easily be the worst cladistic analysis ever published.
> The two included birds (Archaeopteryx, Ichthyornis) somehow manage to
appear
> BASAL TO the outgroup (supposedly based on Petrolacosaurus) in his
consensus
> tree. This is impossible in PAUP.
It is possible. (Though the limitation of taxon names to 10 characters
suggests Hennig86.) I've had it numerous times. When I didn't yet know how
to root trees. In short: Martin published an UNROOTED TREE!!!
> Critiquing it would be too easy, so I'll leave it to all of you to laugh
at.
:-D
In the improbable case that somebody doesn't get the joke, please tell me,
and I'll make that critique. :-)