[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: MNHN SAM 124
From: "Tim Williams" <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com>
This is not to contradict Mickey, but I had considered spinosaurids to be
quite gracile for their size, which would lower the mass estimates compared
to the shorter but more massive carnosaurs.
Of course, this also depends on whether or not you subscribe to notion of
fatty/muscular humps in spinosaurids as well. I'd be interested to see the
range of mass estimates calculated for dinosaurs with and without humps...
Jordan Mallon
Undergraduate Student, Carleton University
Vertebrate Paleontology & Paleoecology
Website: http://www.geocities.com/paleoportfolio/
AIM: jslice mallon
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail