[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Raptors Are Not Dinosaurs? Oh, My!
> From: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu [mailto:owner-dinosaur@usc.edu]On Behalf Of
> T. Michael Keesey
>
> --- "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@geol.umd.edu> wrote:
> > No, there is no such morphological break. In fact, the biggest
> jump in the
> > theropod record is between potential basal theropods (_Eoraptor_,
> > Herrerasauridae) and "eutheropods" (coelophysoids plus Neotheropoda):
>
> "Eutheropoda" hasn't been published, has it?
Not yet. I used it in my disseration for the Ceratosauria-Tetanurae clade,
and I've heard that others want to employ it for a coelophysoid + ceratosaur
+ tetanurine clade.
> As an aside, Paul's _Avepoda_ would be identical in terms of
> known membership,
> although it is apomorphy-based, and hence more inclusive in theory.
>
True enough.
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Vertebrate Paleontologist
Department of Geology Director, Earth, Life & Time Program
University of Maryland College Park Scholars
College Park, MD 20742
http://www.geol.umd.edu/~tholtz/tholtz.htm
http://www.geol.umd.edu/~jmerck/eltsite
Phone: 301-405-4084 Email: tholtz@geol.umd.edu
Fax (Geol): 301-314-9661 Fax (CPS-ELT): 301-405-0796