[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Dinosaur Genera List update #192

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Dinosaur Genera List update #192
From: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 01:04:08 EDT
Reply-to: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

In a message dated 9/7/02 7:28:35 AM EST, stefanpickering2002@yahoo.com 
writes:

<< And so...dinogeorge, for years, has wanted his
 dinosaurs to be separate from "bird", linguistically
 and phylogenetically. This is not dinosaur science,
 nor science. >>

Dunno where you got this crazy notion. I've always been 100% for birds as 
dinosaurs. Or more precisely, dinosaurs as birds, since the birds came first.

Prev by Date: Re: Pronunciation Question (kinda short)
Next by Date: Re: Archaeoraptor et al.
Previous by thread: Re: Dinosaur Genera List update #192
Next by thread: Re: Dinosaur Genera List update #192
Indexes: