T. efremovi

["Tim Donovan" <msdonovan66@hotmail.com>]

  IIRC someone recently wrote that T. efremovi was valid and distinct from 
T. bataar owing to lack of an extension of the postorbital into the orbit in 
the former. I note in the largest specimen after the type, the postorbital 
is partly lost, and its anterior extension is restored with a dotted line. 
Isn't its apparent absence therefore an artifact?






_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail