From: "Brian Lauret" <zthemanvirus@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: zthemanvirus@hotmail.com
To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Tyrant stuff (no longer ranting) (was RE: Rant (was RE: Details on SVP 20...
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 13:16:03 +0000
From: "Tim Donovan" <msdonovan66@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: msdonovan66@hotmail.com
To: andyfarke@hotmail.com, dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Tyrant stuff (no longer ranting) (was RE: Rant (was RE: Details on SVP 20...
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 06:10:51 -0500
From: "Andrew A. Farke" <andyfarke@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: andyfarke@hotmail.com
To: <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Tyrant stuff (no longer ranting) (was RE: Rant (was RE: Details on SVP 20...
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:39:15 -0700
> If it was so easy to get across, why are there no ceratopine or
> centrosaurine ceratopians in Asia (for example)? Easy for one means easy
for
> all.
What happened to Turanoceratops?This had been called a centrosaurine ceratopid wasn't it?Habitat differences between the two continents may have rendered it difficult for ceratopsids to become established in Asia
This is the best explanation IMHO. Note that taxa which successfully emigrated were broad snouted e.g. ankylosaurids, hadrosaurs, whereas narrow snouted, more selective feeders such as nodosaurs and big ceratopsids may not have found enough of their preferred vegetation to survive in Asia, where the climate was generally more arid.
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Zoeken, voor duidelijke zoekresultaten! http://search.msn.nl/worldwide.asp