>Some life forms were not affected at all, it would appear --
again, why? <
Some friends of mine were discussing this very
thing last night, and it would appear to me that the key factor is the ability
to go into torpor/hibernate. If you look at what terrestrial animals
survived, you have toads/frogs/salamanders/turtles, which I believe can all at
least go into torpor, crocs (which can go for a month without food, right?),
small mammals (which can go into torpor or true hibernation), and birds (which I
heard, I think here, can adjust their metabolic rate). Allan touched on this
point a bit ago.
If one wants to take it a bit further, one
could use the fact that non-avian dinosaurs died out at the K/T from a bolide as
evidence that they were endothermic, but not adapted for torpor/hibernation. If
they were ectothermic, from my understanding, it would be easy for them to go
for long periods without food. And judging from the survival pattern, if the
smaller non-avian dinosaurs were able to go into torpor or hibernate, they may
not have gone extinct.
I'm not vouching for the validity of the
second idea here, but I just thought it was potentially interesting. However, I
do think, as far as my knowledge goes, that the first hypothesis has much truth
to it.
Peace,
Rob
Student of Geology
P.O. Box 20840 Flagstaff, Az. 86011 http://dinodomain.com http://www.cafepress.com/robsdinos AIM: TarryAGoat |