[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Benton et al.'s Supertree (longer)
> Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 08:43:20 -0400
> From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@geol.umd.edu>
>
> > Hi all, I checked the archives for *Oviraptosaurs* (without "ro")
> > but although I found it on sevreal posts, I couldn't find who
> > coined it first. Anyone knows?
>
> No one ever "coined" it; it is just a typographical error!
But in the supertree paper -- or, more precisely, in figure 2 (p4),
it's used to indicate a group consisting of:
--+-------- Quarry 9 coelurosaur
+--+--+-- _Beipiaosaurus_
| | `-- _Alxasaurus_
| `--+-- _Erlikosaurus_
| |-- _Therizinosaurus_
| `-- _Segnosaurus_
+--+--+-- El Brevte oviraptosaur
| `-- _Chirostenotes_
|--+-- _Elmisaurus_
| `-- _Microvenator_
`--+-- _Ingenia_
|-- _Oviraptor_
`-- _Conchoraptor_
Which looks more like what Darren called Enigmosauria.
_/|_ _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <mike@miketaylor.org.uk> www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ Ho hum, Silver!