From: "Michael Hanson" <mhanson54@attbi.com>
Reply-To: mhanson54@attbi.com
To: <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Irritator image for review
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 20:01:06 -0500
I used the snout of Angaturama. I don't know much about the specimen, but
from what I've heard in various descriptions of the snout, it seems to have
to have an unusual ridge at the tip. I also believe Irritator and
Angaturama to be one and the same species (individual??). I also realized
that some features in my reconstruction may still be slightly exaggerated
such as the crest, even though it has been reduced to the normal
spinosaurid crest.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Bensen" <dbensen@gotnet.net>
To: <mhanson54@attbi.com>
Cc: <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: Irritator image for review
> So this is what Irritator looks like, now? I had lost track of this
> genus back when plastic surgery was still hot (It's so pretty by itself,
> it should realize that artificial enhansements only make it look
> trashy).
> Seems like a pretty standard spinosaur now, except for that oddly square
> nose. Is that a nasal crest or is the snout actually square in
> cross-section?
>
> Dan
>
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Dinosaurs were not boring, and one can only make them so via ignorance"
-Gregory S. Paul, 1988
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Hanson
Website: Dinosaurworld
Email: mhanson54@attbi.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------