[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Ceratosaur stuff
Jaime Headden wrote:
> It was a very small animal, as is obvious from Luis Rey's painting of
> the Auca Mahuevo site; the sauropods there could squat and kill these
> critters, even when they were full size.
Perhaps that explains the cranial horns of _Carnotaurus_ and _Majungatholus_
- a deterrence against being sat on by angry sauropods!
Mickey Mortimer wrote:
> And the metatarsus lacks the slender second and fourth metatarsals seen
> in several abelisauroids. Metatarsal IV is actually much broader than
> III (sort of like troodontids). So this settles the debate as to
> whether abelisaurids have this character, allowing it to be used to
> group Noasaurus, Masiakasaurus and Velocisaurus in a Noasauridae to the
> exclusion of abelisaurids.
Which state is primitive? Or are both metatarsal proportions derived
relative to coelophysoids and ceratosaurids? In other words, can you be
certain that the proportions seen in _Noasaurus_, _Masiakasaurus_ and
_Velocisaurus_ are not primitive for the Abelisauroidea?
> Whether Ligabueino, Elaphrosaurus, Laevisuchus or Chuandongocoelurus
> are noasaurids too, or somewhere else in the Ceratosauria remains to be
> clarified.
_Chuandongocoelurus_? Haven't heard anything on this fellow for quite a
while. What makes you think it could be an abelisauroid? - thereby making
it the earliest (Middle Jurassic) member of the clade. (Assuming
_Piatnitzkysaurus_ is a basal tetanurine, not an early abelisaur as avered
by Currie.)
By the way, many thanks to Mickey and Mike for the juvenile theropod info.
Much appreciated.
Tim
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Timothy J. Williams, Ph.D.
USDA-ARS Researcher
Agronomy Hall
Iowa State University
Ames IA 50014
Phone: 515 294 9233
Fax: 515 294 9359