Re: See! It's all because they changed Brontosaurus's name! ;-)

["Nicholas Gardner" <n_gardner637@hotmail.com>]

> The article declares the fossils there are 300 million
> years old, yet it says:
>
> "They could have been upset by the students' behaviour. Some might have 
> taken dinosaur remains home,'' he said.
>
> If there are any 300 million-year-old DINOSAUR remains
> there, I'D FAINT TOO!!!

"A 300 million-year-old dinosaur site is a very significant discovery.  I 
hope it is not abandoned."

-B. McFeeters

Are they really 300 million-years old?


Nick Gardner
AIM - CloudRaptor05
MSN - n_gardner637@hotmail.com

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com