[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: Caudipteryx (was Re: Just following the trend of questioning. ..)
Time Williams (TiJaWi@agron.iastate.edu) wrote:
[on reduced third digits]
<What about alvarezsaurids and carnotaurines?>
For the latter, not enough of the manus is known to know exactly how
many digits are present. I can offer that some known condition of the
fourth metacarpal is highly derived, but this is non-provable without an
articulated manus. As for alvarezsaurs, there's only one manus known (for
*Shuvuuia*) which preserves manual digit three, and it is complete with
claw. *Mononykus* preserves metacarpal III as fused to II and the carpus,
but there are no digits preserved despite the retention of a distal ball
joint [which would, as is the case in *Compsognathus*, indicate a third
digit of at least one phalanx]. Nothing more complete is known, but
absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
I wrote (I may have sent this to Tim privately by accident, if not thanks
for sending it along, Tim):
<<Problematically, caenagnathids (improp. elmisaurids) have broad
interpahalngeal joints that would make this difficult, if not impossible.
This indicates a robust articulation, and this is even more etxreme in
*Elmisaurus rarus* than it is in any other taxon; in fact, the ration
between width of the distal and proximal ends and the shaft width is
diagnostic to the taxon so far.>>
<I found this extremely interesting. However, I don't see how this
precludes syndactyly in elmisaurids.>
Because the robustness of the third and second digits prevents their
being parallel. I can further state that the articulations are not
aligned, and the third metacarpal is shorter than the second, providing a
condition not known in syndactylous animals (some birds, diprotodont
marsupials) where phalangeal count is similar, joints are aligned, and
metatarsal-phalangeal joints are aligned. This is just not the case in any
caenagnathid manus I have seen. Furthermore, the metacarpals appear to
diverge to far for the base of the digits to conform, though not as far as
Ostrom's *Deinonychus* manus, it was not as close to parallel as in
oviraptorids. This may be the case in some animals with
similarly-proportioned second and third digits, as occurs in some
dromaeosaurids and ornithomimosaurs, but otherwise there is no concurrence
in oviraptorosaurs of any stripe for syndactyly [at least from what I have
seen].
Cheers,
=====
Jaime A. Headden
Little steps are often the hardest to take. We are too used to making leaps
in the face of adversity, that a simple skip is so hard to do. We should all
learn to walk soft, walk small, see the world around us rather than zoom by it.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com