Re: Details on Capitalsaurus (revised)

["Mickey_Mortimer11" <Mickey_Mortimer11@email.msn.com>]

Tracy Ford wrote-

> It's like you just don't get it. IF you had published the name and the
> diagnoses YOUR NAME WOULD BE ATTACHED TO IT!!! Am I banging my head
against
> the wall? It is up to the writer/author of the paper to do publish
offically
> first the name. Not in quotes, but the name offically. It doesn't matter
> what he entended to do, it is what he did do.

Jees...
If I had, yes.  But.... ahem... I DIDN'T PUBLISH THE NAME AND DIAGNOSIS.  I
might in the future, depending on what the ICZN says regarding the need to
create new genera for species clearly not in the genus they were originally
assigned to, and what Kranz says about it.

> Your DAMN lucky you didn't. If anyone on the list does I sinceraly hopes
> they are booted off the list for life.

Yes, DAMN lucky I think Czerkas is working on the specimen and DAMN lucky
virtually nothing's been published.  If I weren't so DAMN lucky, who knows
what would happen.... :-)

Mickey Mortimer