[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
THEROPOD & ICHTHYOSAUR SKIN
On the integumentary structures in Yixian theropods,
DinoBoyGraphics (or Scott Hartman to his friends I think)
wrote of Larry Martin that...
> He still argues that all integumentary structues from the
> Yixian are muscle/collogen fibers, except, presumably
> those from critters he considers birds. As evidence, he is
> citing an icthyosaur described 2 or 3 issues ago in Lethia
> (I haven't gotten ahold of the paper yet, if anyone can
> share, I'd appreciate it). He claims that it shows "fur-like"
> structures, and since icthyosaurs weren't (likely) furry, it
> must be a diagenetic event.
The papers being referred to are....
Lingham-Soliare, T. 1999. Rare soft-tissue preservation
showing fibrous structures in an ichthyosaur from the
Lower Lias (Jurassic) of England. _Proc. R. Soc. Lond._ B
266, 2367-2373.
- . 2001. The ichthyosaur integument: skin fibers, a means
for a strong, flexible and smooth skin. _Lethaia_ 34, 287-
302.
The fibres seen in these fossils are not diagenetic artefacts
but represent helically-wound cross-fibre arrays in the
dermis and epidermis similar to those seen in assorted
extant sharks and aquatic mammals (actually, some of the
features identified by Lingham-Soliare as skin fibres may be
bone fabric: arguments over their identity are covered in the
2001 paper).
Incidentally, Martin is not the first person to try and pretend
that the structures seen on the theropods are just like those
seen in some soft-tissue-bearing ichthyosaurs as Mike
Howgate has also made this claim in some of his talks on
bird evolution here in the UK. Any examination of the
specimens concerned (or good images of them, as seen in
the above-cited papers) will reveal that ichthyosaur skin
fibres have nothing to do with the bristles and fuzz seen in
the Yixian theropods. I hate to sound like Paul Davis, but if
only someone would (a la Schweitzer et al) do the required
keratin testing on the specimens concerned, most of the silly
scepticism would be removed.
Incidentally I say all this after spending several hours with
NGMC-91, _Caudipteryx_, _Sinosauropteryx_,
_Protarchaeopteryx_, the London _Archaeopteryx_,
_Liaoxiornis_, _Changchengornis_, _Cathayornis_ and
_Confuciusornis_ last week. My wife Toni and Luis Rey
were there too:)
Does anyone know Ilja's current whereabouts? I am
reviewing Paul Chambers' _Bones of Contention: The
Archaeopteryx Scandals_ and would like to ask him some
stuff.
--
Darren Naish
School of Earth & Environmental Sciences
University of Portsmouth UK, PO1 3QL
email: darren.naish@port.ac.uk
tel: 023 92846045