[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
New articles online and in print
From: Ben Creisler bh480@scn.org
A few new articles, two available only online in advance
of publication:
Naturwissenschaften online--advance publications
Short Communication
Europe's last Mesozoic bird
Dyke, Gareth J. , Rudi W. Dortangs, John W. M. Jagt, Eric
W. A. Mulder, Anne S. Schulp and Luis M. Chiappe
Abstract. Birds known from more than isolated skeletal
elements are rare in the fossil record, especially from
the European Mesozoic. This paucity has hindered
interpretations of avian evolution immediately prior to,
and in the aftermath of, the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T)
extinction event. We report on a specimen of a large
ornithurine bird (closely related to Ichthyornis) from the
uppermost Cretaceous (Maastricht Formation) of Belgium.
This is the first record of a bird from these historic
strata and the only phylogenetically informative
ornithurine to be recovered from the Mesozoic of Europe.
Because this new specimen was collected from 40 m below
the K-T boundary (approximate age of 65.8 Ma), it is also
the youngest non-neornithine (=non-modern) bird known from
anywhere in the world.
[Key passages:]
Systematic palaeontology
Aves Linnaeus 1758
Ornithurae Chiappe 1991
Gen. et sp. indet.
Specimen data
NHMM/RD 271 (Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht, The
Netherlands, R.W. Dortangs Collection; is partially
encased in a fine-grained biocalcarenite block and
comprises an incomplete right humerus, a distal end of a
right ulna, a blade of a scapula, a proximal
tarsometatarsus, portions of the mandible, two rod-like
fragments tentatively identified as jugals, and a fragment
tentatively identified as part of a quadrate. Other
elements removed from the block include a proximal portion
of a right coracoid, three thoracic vertebrae, a proximal
tarsal, and a single tooth. Further preparation of NHMM/RD
271 is impossible without compromising existing elements-
embedded bones are in extremely fragile condition and the
surrounding rock is very friable.
Geological context
NHMM/RD 271 was collected from the base of the Valkenburg
Member (Belemnitella junior Zone; >a), within the
Maastricht Formation (Late Maastrichtian, Late Cretaceous)
exposed at the CBR-Romontbos Quarry, west of the village
of Eben Emael (Bassenge), Province of Liège, Belgium
Description
Parts of the left and right rami of the mandible of
NHMM/RD 271 are embedded in oblique ventral view; the left
side is exposed. The dentary is broad and tapers into its
articulation with an elongate angular. The dorsal
articulations of the mandible are not visible. The single
preserved tooth is not in situ and hence it is unclear
whether it belongs to the lower mandible or to the skull.
It is small, recurved and unserrated, with an elliptical
root in cross-section.
The humerus of NHMM/RD 271 is incompletely preserved and
is embedded in oblique cranial view. The head is rounded,
as is typical of all ornithurine birds (Chiappe 2001); the
bicipital crest is large and not markedly expanded
cranially. A well-defined sulcus for the transverse
ligament is present, the deltopectoral crest is rounded,
flat and not cranially deflected, unlike all modern birds
(Chiappe 2001; Clarke and Chiappe 2001 ). The shaft of the
humerus is straight, the proximal and distal ends are not
offset (as is the case in Enantiornithes and more basal
birds, for example Archaeopteryx). On the crushed distal
end of the humerus, a well-developed brachial fossa is
present (although partially obscured by the shaft of the
ulna) and both ventral and dorsal condyles are developed
and rounded. The entire distal end of this element is
deflected cranioventrally. The distal right ulna is
incomplete and fragmentary with a subrounded shaft; its
articulation with the humerus is offset. A medial fragment
of a scapular blade is present; the blade is flat and
wide, the distal end is not preserved. The scapula itself
is curved sagittally, like in the Late Cretaceous
Patagopteryx deferrariisi and all ornithurine birds
(Chiappe 1996 ). The shoulder end of the right coracoid is
broken above the level of the glenoid facet.
The three well-preserved thoracic vertebrae are not
heterocoelic and have small prezygapophyses that project
cranially. The centra are elongated; their cranial and
caudal surfaces are not perforated by foramina. Large
pneumatic fossae are present on the lateral surfaces of
these vertebrae. The ratio between the vertebral foramen
and the cranial surface is more than 0.5, as is the case
in all birds (Chiappe 1996 ).
Discussion
NHMM/RD 271 closely resembles Ichthyornis but is larger in
size [i.e. holotypes of I. dispar (Yale Peabody Museum,
YPM 1450), length of humerus 58 mm; I. victor (YPM 1742),
72 mm; NHMM/RD 271, 98 mm]. However, other than by size,
the partial preservation of NHMM/RD 271 makes comparison
and differentiation from Ichthyornis problematic. More
material of this Belgian bird, combined with a review of
specimens of Ichthyornis, will be required to address this
question. However, as in Ichthyornis, the small tooth of
NHMM/RD 271 is recurved and enameled on both rostral and
caudal surfaces, the thoracic vertebrae bear pronounced
spinous processes, have small ventral processes, and have
large and deeply pneumatized fossae on their lateral
surfaces. Furthermore, the humeral morphology of NHMM/RD
271 is similar to specimens of Ichthyornis in having well-
developed and hooked ventral and dorsal condyles, a deep
brachial impression, a medially deflected distal end, and
an extensive deltopectoral crest. These character
similarities have yet to be tested within a phylogenetic
context.
NHMM/RD 271 is much larger than the recently described
ornithurines Apsaravis (Norell and Clarke 2001 and the
incomplete Limenavis (Clarke and Chiappe 2001 ). NHMM/RD
271 differs from Apsaravis on the basis of a wider and
less uniformly shaped scapular blade and in the more
expanded distal condyles of the humerus. NHMM/RD 271 is
distinct from Limenavis because of a more acute angle
between the dorsal margin of the distal humerus and the
dorsal condyle (this approaches 30° as is the case in
Ichthyornis; Marsh 1880 ).
Although the fossil record of Mesozoic birds has improved
dramatically in recent decades (Chiappe 2001), large
temporal gaps still exist in our knowledge of avian
evolution. The discovery of NHMM/RD 271 confirms that
archaic members of Ornithurae were widespread and
successful components of the avifauna during the last
stages of the Mesozoic. The proximity of this specimen to
the K-T boundary demonstrates that birds of this type
existed until the end of the Cretaceous, at least in
Europe.
------------------------
Annales de Paléontologie Article in Press, Uncorrected
Proof
Late Cretaceous crocodile remains from Naskal (India):
comparisons and biogeographic affinities
Prasad, Guntupalli V. R. and France de Lapparent de Broin
Abstract
Crocodile teeth from the Maastrichtian inter-trappean beds
of Naskal (peninsular India) are described here. Because
of isolated denticles visible on sufficiently preserved
carinae, the presence of a strong heterodonty (in size and
shape), and by comparison to crocodile teeth from various
taxa, they are considered as representing a ziphodont form
with a heterodont dentition. The difference between
ziphodont, "false ziphodont" and non-ziphodont dentitions
is evaluated. With the help of scanning electron
microscope photographs, it is shown that only precise
characteristics of the denticles and not the tooth shape,
allow to distinguish the three categories. These three
categories do not correspond to monophyletic groups. It is
also shown that the "alligatorid" heterodonty, meso- or
eusuchian in grade, exists in each category. Although the
ziphodont dentition is not sufficient to allow a
taxonomical definition, the peculiarities that it often
presents, depending on the taxa as well as the teeth
shape, enable systematic approaches. An examination of
previous works on the possible ziphodont crocodiles from
the Tertiary deposits of the Indian subcontinent and on
Naskal teeth demonstrate that the latter are closer to
those of some Gondwanan crocodiles of mesosuchian grade,
known from the early Cretaceous of Africa and possibly a
form from the late Cretaceous of Madagascar. They are
excluded from eusuchian Laurasiatic as well as Paleogene
forms of the Indian subcontinent, either ziphodont or not.
Contrary to the earlier works on the inter-trappean
crocodiles, the present study removes this group as one of
the evidences in support of an early (late Cretaceous-
early Tertiary) India/Asia collision model. In fact, it
provides an additional support for the existence of
possible Cretaceous biogeographic links between India,
Madagascar, Africa, and South America.
Bühler, Paul und Walter J. Bock, 2002. Zur Archaeopteryx-
Nomenklatur: Missverständnisse und Lösung. Journal für
Ornithologie 143 (3): 269 -286
Summary
Nomenclature of Archaeopteryx: Misunderstandings and
solution
The generally accepted name Archaeopteryx lithographica
von Meyer, 1861, for the ancient feathered birds from the
Solnhofen limestones has been the subject of a number of
nomenclatural analyses, terminating in two decisions by
the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature to
conserve this name. Overlooked in these decisions was the
determination of the type specimen for this binomen. A
strong difference of opinion exists on whether the first
found isolated feather impression or the London specimen
of a feathered skeleton is the holotype. We conclude that
the isolated feather impression (main slab in Berlin and
counterslab in Munich) is the holotype of Archaeopteryx
lithographica von Meyer, 1861. This isolated feather
cannot be identified with certainty to any generic taxa
and/or any specific taxa containing any of the Solnhofen
feathered skeletons; hence the name Archaeopteryx
lithographica would be a nomen dubium and cannot serve as
the valid name for any generic or specific taxa containing
the feathered skeletons. Resolution of this nomenclatural
problem can be achieved by requesting the ICZN to set
aside the isolated feather impression as the holotype and
to declare the London specimen as the neotype, which we
have done in a separate application to the ICZN.