[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Hadrosaur Appearance



 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu [mailto:owner-dinosaur@usc.edu]On Behalf Of Allan Edels
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 11:05 PM
To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: RE: Hadrosaur Appearance

 

Kris:

 

I’ve excerpted part of a previous discussion from the Dino List (Sep. 2, 1998):

 

  My opinion is based on historical perspective of past 
  reconstructions.  I think that some of the hadrosaurs 
  with long necks (especially in comparison to the skull size) 
  and those sigmoid neck curves seem to look better with the 
  thinner neck (not necessarily as thin as some of us older 
  folks are used to :-) ).   I say better because the shape 
  is more in proportion with the rest of the body and skull, 
  and allows more freedom of movement for these longer 
  necked creatures.  Whereas the shorter-necked (again in 
  proportion to the skull and the rest of the body) animals 
  look fine with the thicker, more muscled neck.
 
  I'm wondering if it is possible for there to be 2 morphs 
  for hadrosaurian necks?  I'm not saying there has to be – 
  just wondering because it seems to fit available data.<<
 
What are the short necked hadrosaurs and what are the long necked ones?
 
 
         Thanks for your reply.
 
                 Allan Edels

 

 The two Mummifed Edmontosaurs have what may be considered a neck that is in between the two types you suggest.

 

Tracy L. Ford

P. O. Box 1171

Poway Ca  92074