From: "Jaime A. Headden" <qilongia@yahoo.com>
To: dinosaur@usc.edu
CC: kinman@hotmail.com
Subject: re: ornithosuchids
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 03:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Ken Kinman (kinman@hotmail.com) wrote:
<"Ornithes" would not be necessary. If Pterosaurs are non-archosaurs, then
we can use: (1)
Ornithosuchia (if ornithosuchids are closer to birds than to crocs); or (2)
Avemetatarsalia if
ornithosuchids are closer to crocs than to birds. That is another reason
why Crurotarsi (and its
purported "synapomorphies") need to be carefully reevaluated, and the
sooner the better. Where
Ornithosuchidae fits in is still very uncertain and very controversial.>
The definition of Crurotarsi does not depend on Ornithosuchus, and thus
neither does its
content. It's wise not to confuse the two. However, I beleive you are not
an advocate of formulaic
definitions of clades, or else why the continuing advocacy of concept based
usage? Anyways...
=====
Jaime A. Headden
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhr-gen-ti-na
Where the Wind Comes Sweeping Down the Pampas!!!!
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com