[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: dino naming conventions

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: dino naming conventions
From: Richard W Travsky <rtravsky@uwyo.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 21:10:18 -0700 (MST)
In-reply-to: <73.153cf34d.2910b874@aol.com>
Reply-to: rtravsky@uwyo.edu
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

On Tue, 30 Oct 2001 Dinogeorge@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 10/30/01 6:53:18 PM EST, 4mjmu@home.com writes:
> 
> << Can anyone point me in the direction of a document outlining
>  paleontological naming conventions, esp. concerning the various
>  conditions under which one name gets used over another?  Please reply
>  offlist if this is not of general interest. >>
> 
> You could do worse than visit the Dinosaur Genera List and read the 
> introductory comments on that page:
> 
> http://members.aol.com/Dinogeorge/dinolist.com
> 

oops     http://members.aol.com/Dinogeorge/dinolist.html

References:
- Re: dino naming conventions
  - From: Dinogeorge@aol.com

Prev by Date: Re: nomenclature vs. identification key (last one)
Next by Date: Re: bats & battalions (+ pentastomids & marsupials)
Previous by thread: Re: dino naming conventions
Next by thread: Re: dino naming conventions
Indexes: