|
I agree that it doesn't look like typical Henderson
work. The dinosaurs themselves look too much like the JP dinos, and a
little bit Gurche-like. Some of the backgrounds look a little Photoshop
touched-up to me, as well. Not that any of that is bad, they just
don't strike me as markers of Hendersen work.
But, hey, if those are Hendersen, don't hold it
against me!
-Demetrios Vital
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 5:44
PM
Subject: RE: National Geographic's book
of dinosaurs
-----Original
Message-----
From: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu [mailto:owner-dinosaur@usc.edu]On Behalf Of Danvarner@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 5:22
PM
To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: National Geographic's book
of dinosaurs
In a
message dated 10/27/01 4:14:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time, SNOWFL96@aol.com writes:
<< Here is one image from inside the "National Geographic
book of dinosaurs."
It looks sooo tempting!
Enjoy! >>
Apparently, Doug Henderson's
art was tempting also. DV <<
Are
you sure its Doug’s work? It doesn’t quite have the same look/feel to it. I
looked for a signature but couldn’t find one on the
painting.
If
this is just a small taste of what the book will be, it’ll be worth
it.
Tracy L. Ford
P. O. Box 1171
Poway Ca 92074
|