[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Dinosaurs of the Air

To: <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Dinosaurs of the Air
From: Raymond Ancog <rayancog@pacific.net.ph>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 21:27:51 +0900
In-reply-to: <002e01c15e8c$cd2b8ba0$6480a8c0@rmdws1.il.home.com>
References: <20011026063003.3217.qmail@web12404.mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: rayancog@pacific.net.ph
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

This is just a side comment, but when the average person hears or sees the phrase "Dinosaurs of the Air," chances are what will come to mind, pterosaurs (are dinosaurs) or bird are dinosaur descendants (and even dinosaurs themselves? If it's the former case, it could inadvertently turn out to be beneficial because people will then react in surprise, "What, pterosaurs aren't dinosaurs?!" and then will be forced to realize that (for most of us anyway) birds are in the dinosaur clade. Just wondering how a good book title goes a long way.

Raymond Thaddeus C. Ancog
Mines and Geosciences Bureau
Philippines

References:
- Dinosaurs of the Air
  - From: Waylon Rowley <whte_rbt_obj@yahoo.com>
- Re: Dinosaurs of the Air
  - From: "Michael Hanson" <mhanson54@home.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Personal Perspectives [was crocodylians, amphibians ... (was Sarcosuchus)]
Next by Date: Re: Sarcosuchus
Previous by thread: Re: Dinosaurs of the Air
Next by thread: Hypuronector, many questions, one (long) answer.
Indexes: