[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Ref.s (Was Armadillo) follow up

To: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Subject: Re: Ref.s (Was Armadillo) follow up
From: John Bois <jbois@umd5.umd.edu>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 22:33:18 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <ab.10af254f.28fa4554@aol.com>
Reply-to: jbois@umd5.umd.edu
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 Dinogeorge@aol.com wrote:

> OK, but does he actually >have< dinosaurs from above the iridium layer(s)? 
> Talk is cheap.

They're saying that these Ir peaks are before the K/T.  Yes, they have
dinosaurs above them.  More from the abstract: "(these deposits) have
revealed a profuse occurence of theropod eggshell fragments...in beds
overlying the iridium-enriched levels."  They detail evidence for why
these are not reworked (I'm not able to evaluate this).

References:
- Re: Ref.s (Was Armadillo) follow up
  - From: Dinogeorge@aol.com

Prev by Date: Re: Ref.s (Was Armadillo) follow up
Next by Date: Re: Ref.s (Was Armadillo) follow up
Previous by thread: Re: Ref.s (Was Armadillo) follow up
Next by thread: Re: Ref.s (Was Armadillo) follow up
Indexes: