RE: kritosaurus?

[Paleo_Mont <paleo_mont@excite.com>]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 20:21:49 -0700, dino.hunter@home.com wrote:

>  
>  
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu [mailto:owner-dinosaur@usc.edu]On Behalf Of
>  Paleo_Mont
>  Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 7:55 PM
>  To: befreeasabird@yahoo.com; dinosaur@usc.edu
>  Subject: Re: kritosaurus?
>  
>  In case no one has answered this... I will.... tired of fluffy dinos.
>  <smirks>
>  There maybe a picture of the skull of _Kritosaurus_ in the Dinosauria. If
>  not I am sure I can find one from Horners Monograph that I can send you,
or
>  could always contact Jack or someone at the Museum of the Rockies and see
if
>  you could get a drawing or something of it as well.  Hmmm is only
>  -Hadrosaurine- and -Lambeosaurine- for the Hadrosaurs. Oh ya _Kritosaur_
is
>  a -Hadrosaurine-.  I am assuming that the -Saurolophoni-, is one of the
old
>  names that used to be used for the semi crested Hadrosaurine's?
>  
>  Anyways thats it from here,
>  
>  Paleo Mont
>  K.Wicks<<
>  
>  I do believe he was referring to the new skull material that was in the
>  poster not any Kritosaurus skull. The skull material that was in the
poster,
>  if I remember correctly, are nasals, maxilla, dentary and maybe some
other
>  skull parts. The nasals really reminded me of the G. latidens. The
material
>  that he is studying from Mexico (I believe) is different. The lower jaw
is
>  much more deep and nasals thicker and shorter.
>  
>  
Perhaps true, but if your gonna do good research you need to look at all the
refering materials as well. not just one skull.




K.Wicks
Paleo Mont - www.geocities.com/paleo_mont
Paleo Mont Park - www.geocities.com/paleo_montpark





_______________________________________________________
http://inbox.excite.com