[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Reporters
At 4:07 PM -0600 10/8/01, Richard W Travsky wrote:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991393
(NOTE: I wonder if this is the guy who list members said was wandering
around taking notes on conversations?)
No, I was not at the meeting, but was working from abstracts
published in the conference digest. I tried to reach Elizabeth Rega
and Chris Brochu by phone, but neither replied to messages left at
the SVP message desk. (I know the messages were out because another
paleontologist did.) The digest papers and material at the Field
Museum provided the details I needed to meet my deadline. This week's
issue -- out Thursday in London -- will have reports on two other SVP
papers.
While I'm here, I should explain what are considered good
journalistic practices at conferences.
First, anything presented in an open paper (including the published
abstract) is fair game for working journalists, whether or not we
talk directly to the scientist presenting the paper. Normally I try
to contact the researcher individually -- by phone or in person if
I'm attending the meeting. The scientists may decline to comment if
they have a paper in press or want to submit one to the major
"embargo" journals such as Nature or Science. (They also may simply
not get around to returning my calls for other reasons.) If the
material presented orally and/or in a printed abstract is clear
enough, a journalist can go ahead and write it up. That will not
block publication if what the reporter writes is based on a
presentation at an open scientific conference like SVP. (Oral papers
that I've covered at both SVP and the Geological Society of America
have shown up months later in Nature and Science.) Press conferences
are a different matter.
Second, working journalists may ask other knowledgeable observers for
comments, formally or informally. We're not experts, and real experts
on this list have been very helpful in my attempts to cover dinosaurs
and other paleontology stories.
Third, a journalist should identify themselves as so and so writing
for such and such. If you're working on a blockbuster paper for
Science or Nature on results you just hinted at in your talk, you can
say you can't provide details because you have a paper in press or
preparation.
Fourth, if somebody's told me about unpublished research that looks
newsworthy, I will call the scientist up and ask if they can say
anything about it. If you can't say anything about it, don't. But it
is courteous to put that journalist on the list to alert when you CAN
talk about it.
Fifth, many -- but not all -- journalists will honor embargoes. I've
been aware of a few papers well in advance of their appearance in
Science or Nature, and have honored my pledge not to talk about them.
The embargo system is designed to give us time to contact sources in
advance and prepare articles properly for publication after the issue
appears. It allows us to cover the research much better than
otherwise possible. I may think what I wrote about the coming Nature
or Science is really neat -- but I wait until after the embargo time
to say anything here about it.
Sixth, there are some 'amateur' journalists out there excited about
dinosaurs who publish their own journals on the web. There also are
people who are kind enough to post informal reports on conferences
for those of us who couldn't go. I'm grateful for what they do, but
as a professional I check with the scientists who did the original
work -- or read what's in print -- before publishing anything.
Finally, be aware that there are some less-than-reputable
publications out there. If a journalist is rather vague about the
publication they're writing about, it might be the Weekly World News
or the National Enquirer. (I once got caught this way on another
topic, and was interviewed by Britain's "Sunday Sport," which is
pretty close to the Weekly World News.) Actually, you should be able
to laugh the tabloids off better than you could the story written by
a local reporter who knows nothing about dinosaurs but who happens to
encounter you in a local bar near your field site after you've had a
few beers too many.
-- Jeff Hecht
--
Jeff Hecht science & technology writer
525 Auburn St. Auburndale, MA 02466 USA
V 617-965-3834 f 617-332-4760
jhecht@world.std.com or jeff.hecht@sff.net
http://www.sff.net/people/jeff.hecht
For fiber optics: http://www.fiberhome.com
Correspondent, New Scientist magazine
Contributing editor, Laser Focus World