[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Reporters



At 4:07 PM -0600 10/8/01, Richard W Travsky wrote:
 http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991393


(NOTE: I wonder if this is the guy who list members said was wandering around taking notes on conversations?)

No, I was not at the meeting, but was working from abstracts published in the conference digest. I tried to reach Elizabeth Rega and Chris Brochu by phone, but neither replied to messages left at the SVP message desk. (I know the messages were out because another paleontologist did.) The digest papers and material at the Field Museum provided the details I needed to meet my deadline. This week's issue -- out Thursday in London -- will have reports on two other SVP papers.


While I'm here, I should explain what are considered good journalistic practices at conferences.

First, anything presented in an open paper (including the published abstract) is fair game for working journalists, whether or not we talk directly to the scientist presenting the paper. Normally I try to contact the researcher individually -- by phone or in person if I'm attending the meeting. The scientists may decline to comment if they have a paper in press or want to submit one to the major "embargo" journals such as Nature or Science. (They also may simply not get around to returning my calls for other reasons.) If the material presented orally and/or in a printed abstract is clear enough, a journalist can go ahead and write it up. That will not block publication if what the reporter writes is based on a presentation at an open scientific conference like SVP. (Oral papers that I've covered at both SVP and the Geological Society of America have shown up months later in Nature and Science.) Press conferences are a different matter.

Second, working journalists may ask other knowledgeable observers for comments, formally or informally. We're not experts, and real experts on this list have been very helpful in my attempts to cover dinosaurs and other paleontology stories.

Third, a journalist should identify themselves as so and so writing for such and such. If you're working on a blockbuster paper for Science or Nature on results you just hinted at in your talk, you can say you can't provide details because you have a paper in press or preparation.

Fourth, if somebody's told me about unpublished research that looks newsworthy, I will call the scientist up and ask if they can say anything about it. If you can't say anything about it, don't. But it is courteous to put that journalist on the list to alert when you CAN talk about it.

Fifth, many -- but not all -- journalists will honor embargoes. I've been aware of a few papers well in advance of their appearance in Science or Nature, and have honored my pledge not to talk about them. The embargo system is designed to give us time to contact sources in advance and prepare articles properly for publication after the issue appears. It allows us to cover the research much better than otherwise possible. I may think what I wrote about the coming Nature or Science is really neat -- but I wait until after the embargo time to say anything here about it.

Sixth, there are some 'amateur' journalists out there excited about dinosaurs who publish their own journals on the web. There also are people who are kind enough to post informal reports on conferences for those of us who couldn't go. I'm grateful for what they do, but as a professional I check with the scientists who did the original work -- or read what's in print -- before publishing anything.

Finally, be aware that there are some less-than-reputable publications out there. If a journalist is rather vague about the publication they're writing about, it might be the Weekly World News or the National Enquirer. (I once got caught this way on another topic, and was interviewed by Britain's "Sunday Sport," which is pretty close to the Weekly World News.) Actually, you should be able to laugh the tabloids off better than you could the story written by a local reporter who knows nothing about dinosaurs but who happens to encounter you in a local bar near your field site after you've had a few beers too many.

-- Jeff Hecht
--
Jeff Hecht science & technology writer
525 Auburn St. Auburndale, MA 02466 USA
V 617-965-3834 f 617-332-4760
jhecht@world.std.com or jeff.hecht@sff.net
http://www.sff.net/people/jeff.hecht
For fiber optics: http://www.fiberhome.com
Correspondent, New Scientist magazine
Contributing editor, Laser Focus World