Hi everyone. I just returned from SVP 2001 in
Bozeman and I'm here to provide in depth coverage of the talks I attended and
posters I read. I had a great time meeting many of you, as well as some
other professionals. The first day was dominated by the sauropod
symposium, with the other talks on condylarths, histology and CT scanning.
I only attended most of the sauropod symposium and the first half of the
condylarth talk. I will discuss the sauropod posters tomorrow, along with
the many posters shown on Thursday.
Upchurch and Barrett, 2001. A phylogenetic
perspective on sauropod diversity. JVP 21(3) 110A.
This was about estimating change in sauropod
diversity using both a simple taxon count, as well as one taking ghost lineages
into account. Sauropods diversify in the Middle Jurassic, become most
diverse during the Late Jurassic, lower in numbers a bit in the Early Cretaceous
and diversify again (though not as much as in the LJ) in the Late
Cretaceous. I think there are problems with ghost lineages involving taxa
we can't place precisely yet, but my favorite part of the talk was the new
cladogram by Upchurch. It used 309 characters and 47 taxa.
|-Vulcanodon
`-+-Kotasaurus `-+-Shunosaurus `-+-+-Barapasaurus | `-+-Cetiosaurus | `-Patagosaurus `-+-+-Omeisaurus | `-Tehuelchisaurus `-+-Mamenchisaurus `-+-Euhelopus `-+-Lourinhasaurus `-+-+-+-Nemegtosaurus | | `-Quaesitosaurus | `-+-Rayososaurus | `-+-+-Amargasaurus | | `-Dicraeosaurus | `-+-Apatosaurus | `-+-Diplodocus | `-Barosaurus `-+-+-Bellusaurus | `-+-Atlasaurus | `-Jobaria `-+-Camarasaurus `-+-Haplocanthosaurus `-Titanosauriformes I didn't get the chance to write the
titanosauriform taxa, but will update once I contact Upchurch. He was
very friendly and told me of his upcoming paper sorting out
Cetiosaurus. Notable is the lack of any type of Euhelopodidae, a
monophyletic Cetiosauridae, an odd basal camarasauromorph clade containing
Atlasaurus, Jobaria and Bellusaurus (Bellusauridae has priority here I believe)
and diplodocoid nemegtosaurids. I don't think Upchurch included
Rapetosaurus, but he said he was very interested in the taxon.
Wilson, 2001. Anatomy of Jobaria tiguidensis and
the relationships of Neosauropoda. JVP 21(3) 115A.
Not much new was revealed about Jobaria, but
Macronaria and Diplodocoidea were compared. The former is diagnosed by many
appendicular characters, the latter by cranial characters. Another
cladogram was presented here, this one with 222 characters and 25
taxa.
|-Vulcanodon
`-+-Shunosaurus `-+-Barapasaurus `-+-Patagosaurus `-+-+-Omeisaurus | `-Mamenchisaurus `-+-Jobaria `-+-Haplocanthosaurus `-+-+-+-Rayososaurus | | `-Rebbachisaurus | `-+-+-Amargasaurus | | `-Dicraeosaurus | `-+-Apatosaurus | `+-Diplodocus | `-Barosaurus `-+-Camarasaurus `-+-Brachiosaurus `-+-Euhelopus `-Titanosauria Unfortunately, I didn't get the titanosaurian
section copied in time (these cladograms are up for 20 seconds or so), nor did I
talk to Wilson. Now he has a mamenchisaur-omeisaur clade, but Euhelopus is
still a titanosauriform.
Curry Rogers, 2001. A new sauropod from Madagascar:
Implications for titanosaur lower level phylogeny. JVP 21(3) 43A.
Curry Rogers presented data on Rapetosaurus
(unnamed as of publication) and the other Maevarano titanosaur- "taxon B".
This species is known from a coracoid (MAD 96-01) and an articulated series of
distal caudals (MAD 99-33). The caudals are much lower than Rapetosaurus,
while the coracoid is anteroposteriorly shorter with a wide scapular
articulation and distal groove (not a coracoid foramen). Yet another
cladogram was presented, this one focused on the Camarasauramorpha. 364
characters and 35 taxa were used, but over 200,000 MPT's were generated, making
a huge polytomy (which I couldn't read due to the small text anyway). A
reduced consensus was performed with taxa scorable for over 15% of the
characters (plus taxon B), including 19 taxa.
|-Camarasaurus
`-+-Brachiosaurus `-+-Euhelopus `-+-Phuwiangosaurus `-+-Ampelosaurus `-+-+-Lirainosaurus | `-+-Rocosaurus | `+-Neuquensaurus | `-+-Saltasaurus | `-taxon B `-+-+-Nemegtosaurus | `-Rapetosaurus `-Titanosauridae I didn't get a chance to see what was in the
Titanosauridae. Curry Rogers recommends dividing titanosaurs into three
clades- Saltasauridae, Titanosauridae and the "Rapetosaurus clade" (why she
didn't just say Nemegtosauridae is confusing).
Sereno and Wilson, 2001. A sauropod tooth battery:
Structure and evolution. JVP 21(3) 100A-101A.
Sereno presented this talk, focusing on
Nigersaurus. Several skeletons are now known and he showed a slide of the
reconstructed mandibles in dorsal view, as well as the skull in lateral
view. Much is unknown and the back is based on Rayososaurus, but it looked
pretty cool. Large orbit placed posterodorsally, smaller naris not
extending past the orbit with a low aof below. Triangular snout with
anteriorly placed teeth. Anyone who wants my rough sketch contact me
offlist. A diplodocoid cladogram was presented-
|-+-Rayososaurus
| |-Rebbachisaurus | `-+-Nigersaurus | `-Antarctosaurus `-+-+-Amargasaurus | `-Dicraeosaurus `-+-Apatosaurus `|-Diplodocus |-Barosaurus `-"Barosaurus" africanus A titanosaur has been found in the Elrhaz Formation
(with Nigersaurus). It's known from a partial skeleton including skull
fragments, cervicals, dorsals, sacrals and a pelvis. In addition, a
diplodocoid and titanosaur (the latter very complete, with several individuals)
has been found in the Cenomanian of Niger (perhaps the Baharija
Formation?).
Wedel, 2001. The evolution of vertebral
pneumaticity in the Sauropoda. JVP 21(3) 111A-112A.
This was a great talk that emphasized osteological
evidence for pneumatic airsacs in sauropods and concluded that like birds, the
presacral column was pneumatized by the cervical airsac while abdominal airsacs
pneumatized the sacrals and proximal caudals. He hypothesized both
neosauropods and coelurosaurs developed abdominal airsacs (or else ancestrally
had them, and just entered the vertebraal bodies in parallel).
Stevens and Parrish, 2001. Biological implications
of digital reconstructions of the whole body of sauropod dinosaurs. JVP
21(3) 104A.
Dicraeosaurus has a strongly downward sloping neck
if the vertebral articulations are lined up neutrally, while Euhelopus' is
slightly downward sloping. Brachiosaurus brancai has a near horizontal
neck. Cool, but I'd like to see modern animals tested this way and
compared to their actual postures. Platt apparently has a 2001 paper
advocating an odd ventrally placed and horizontal scapulocoracoid position in
sauropods. I'd like to see that too.
Chure, 2001. A new sauropod with a well preserved
skull from the Cedar Mountain Fm. (Cretaceous) of Dinosaur National Monument,
UT. JVP 21(3) 40A.
A new specimen from the Poison Strip Member of the
Cedar Mountain Formation (Aptian-Albian) preserves a complete skull and first
three cervicals. The skull looks like Camarasaurus, but with a diplodocoid
naris. The snout is short and dorsally narrow, with a laterally facing
subnarial foramen and preantorbital fenestra. The naris is placed like
Camarasaurus, but the internarial bar is incomplete dorsally.
The quadrate is vertical, the frontals contact the orbits and the jugal is
excluded from the ventral skull margin. The mandible has an external
mandibular fenestra and possibly a chin. The tooth rows are extensive (3
pmx, 10 mx), the teeth being unexpanded, with convex labial and straight lingual
margins and no enamel ornamentation. They are said to be similar to the
Astrodon/Pleurocoelus type. The cervicals are elongate with ribs extending
two centrum lengths. Other material found in the quarry includes caudals,
pectoral and pelvic elements and limb elements (including elongate
metacarpals). There is also another different skull in the quarry though,
so it is unknown which postcrania are associated with which taxon. The
skull was added to Upchurch's 1998 and 1999 analyses and came out as a basal
diplodocoid (below nemegtosaurids, rebbachisaurids, dicraeosaurids and
diplodocids). They say that with nemegtosaurids coming out as titanosaurs
in several recent analyses, these results may change. Neosauropoda
incertae sedis I guess. Anyone who wants my sketch of the skull, contact
me offlist.
Apesteguia, de Valais, Gonzalez, Gallina and
Agnolin, 2001. The tetrapod fauna of "La Buitrera", new locality from Candeleros
Formation (Lower Cenomanian) of North Patagonia, Argentina. JVP 21(3)
29A.
This described new remains from the Early
Cenomanian Candeleros Member of the Rio Limay Formation. These include two
theropod tooth forms- 20 mm abelisaurids (identified by morphology and serration
density) and 215 mm carcharodontosaurids (probably Giganotosaurus). Other
theropod teeth and phalanges are also known. Sauropods like Andesaurus and
Rayososaurus dominate the fauna.
Lamanna, Martinez, Luna, Casal, Dodson and Smith,
2001. Sauropod faunal transition through the Cretaceous Chubut Group of Central
Patagonia. JVP 21(3) 71A.
A basal titanosauriform originally described by
Martinez (1989) is re-examined. The specimen (including UNPSJB-PV 788 and
988; from the Aptian Matasiete Formation) consists of a scapula, incomplete
humerus, ulna and incomplete femur. It's huge, the ulna being 1.18 meters
and the scapula 1.73 meters. The scapula has a ventral process caudal to
the glenoid, like Brachiosaurus and Paralititan. From the Middle
Cenomanian-Coniacian Lower Bajo Barreal Formation comes an almost complete
skeleton of Epachthosaurus, lacking only the skull and neck. It has
hyposphene-hypantrum articulations in its dorsals and procoelous distal
caudals. A phylogenetic analysis places it as a basal titanosaurian.
Also from this section of the formation comes the National Geographic titanosaur
skull and cervical series, and a rebbachisaurid cervical (identified due to the
accessory lamina connecting the spinoprezygopophyseal and postzygodiapophyseal
laminae). In the Turonian Upper Bajo Barreal Formation, two specimens were
announced. First is fourteen articulated caudals of a titanosaur strongly
resembling Aeolosaurus and Gondwanatitan. Second is a rebbachisaurid
caudal (UNPSJB-PV 580)
There were several other talks I saw that day too,
including
- Russell, Taquet and Wheeler, 2001. Oceanic anoxic
events (OAE's), Sauropods and angiosperms in the Saharan tropics. JVP 21(3)
95A.
- Barrett and Upchurch, 2001. Feeding mechanisms
and changes in sauropod palaeoecology through time. JVP 21(3) 32A.
- Chiappe, Coria, Dingus, Salgado and Jackson,
2001. Titanosaur eggs and embryos from Auca Mahuevo (Patagonia, Argentina):
Implications for sauropod reproductive behavior. JVP 21(3) 40A.
- Bonnan, 2001. Separating size from shape: Using
thin-plate splines to evaluate humerus functional morphology in Apatosaurus,
Diplodocus, and Camarasaurus. JVP 21(3) 34A-35A.
- Carrano, 2001. The evolution of sauropod
locomotion: Morphological diversity of a secondarily quadrupedal radiation. JVP
21(3) 38A.
- Barrick and Russell, 2001. Physiologic
implications of ontogenetic variability in oxygen isotope distribution in
sauropods. JVP 21(3) 32A.
Two talks were not given-
Apesteguia and Gimenez, 2001. The Late
Jurassic-Early Cretaceous worldwide record of basal titanosauriforms and the
origin of titanosaurians (Sauropoda): New evidence from the Aptian (Lower
Cretaceous) of Chubut Province, Argentina. JVP 21(3) 29A.
Describes a new non-titanosaurid titanosaur from
the Aptian Cerro Barcino Formation of Argentina. This specimen has-
strongly opisthocoelous dorsals; hyposphene-hypantra; acuminate dorsal
pleurocoels; centroparapophyseal laminae; unforked neural spines; postspinal
laminae; step shaped articulation in the scapulocoracoid; square
coracoid.
Gonzalez Riga and Calvo, 2001. A new genus and
species of titanosaurid sauropod from the Upper Cretaceous of Rincon de los
Sauces, Neuquen, Argentina. JVP 21(3) 55A.
Describes a new titanosaurid from the
Coniacian-Santonian Rio Colorado Formation including cervicals, dorsals,
caudals, chevrons, scapula, coracoids, humerus, metacarpals, ilium, pubis
and femur. The cervicals are opisthocoelous without cervicals.
The dorsals have aliform posteriorly sloping neural spines without saltasaurid
characters. The caudals are mostly strongly procoelous, but some are
biconcave and biconvex.
Mickey
Mortimer |