[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: *Giganotosaurus* running 50 km/h(the truth!!!!)



For all the info that Horner and what's his name have, there is 30 times as much info in the opposite direction.

T.rex scavenging theory-

1. t.rex bones being mote than any other at hell creek
2. puny arms
3. large olfactory chamber

T.rex hunter theory-

1. no large predator today is a complete scavenger
2. vulctures, (the most famous of scavengers) soars instead of flapping it's wings continuously so it can conserve more energy and in turn, live off scavenging
3. t.rex bones are less brittle than other bones of other dinosaurs, so you find more t.rex bones at the hell creek formation
4. healed (t.rex) bitemarks on a hadrosaur
5. binocular vision
6. super-muscular jaws that can withstand enormous stresses
7. "puny" arms that could lift 100+ pounds

anti bird-dinosaur theory

1. longisquama having a form of proto-feathers covering parts of it's body
2. the liver and other "juicy" parts of a small predatory dinosaur differ from the organs of modern day birds

dinosaur-bird theory

1. archeopteryx: a bird with a dinosaurian tail and teeth
2. caudipteryx
3. sinosauropteryx
4. beipiaosaurus
5. sinornithosaurus
6. wishbones in spinosaurs, tyrannosaurs, dromaeosaurs and so on
7. oviraptorid with a pygostyl: an ossified bone at the end of the tail that "holds up" the tail feathers which is common in birds
8. feathered dinosaurs with feathers blanketing most of the body, including the arms
9. longisquama with proto-feathers exclusively on it's back
10. feathers found in a psittacosaurid
11. pterosaurs
12. longisquama living in the early to middle triassic
13. dinosaurian bone structure conclusively found to be "duplicated" in the bone
structure of birds

Of course this is all beyond the point.

I think you guys missed the moral to this story (ahhh, but everyone always does).

I was just saying that you shouldn't try to justify a theory by saying  "there is no proof what so ever" (<Horner) to the oppositional proof.

I'm sorry that you guys misunderstood the meaning of my email.

I did not mean to say that Jack Horner was "wrong," but just to say that his form of reasoning is faultered.

Take a chill pill.
                                                                         Mark the illustrator