Re: Dinosaur Genera List corrections #176

[Dinogeorge@aol.com]

In a message dated 11/5/01 2:09:26 AM EST, tommy.tyrberg@aerotechtelub.se 
writes:

<< This is a purely anglosaxon idea. At least in Europe dissertations have
 always been properly published and counted as peer-reviewed
 publications. As a matter of fact in most european countries no
 publication you ever write is likely to be as carefully reviewed as your
 dissertation.
 There is any number of scientific name in use that were originally
 published in dissertations. >>

Here are some more good reasons for including dissertation names in the 
Dinosaur Genera List despite their lack of recognition by the ICZN.