From: Ronald Orenstein <ornstn@home.com>
Reply-To: ornstn@home.com
To: ELurio@aol.com, kinman@hotmail.com, dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Turtles and Diverity was Re: Classification of Plesiosaurs
and Ichthyosaurs?
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 11:55:49 -0400
At 08:47 AM 18/05/01 -0400, ELurio@aol.com wrote:
WHY?!?!?!?!?! Shouldn't a greater diversity of life living today be far
cooler than greater extinction of forms? Assuming that turtles are
anapsids,
isn't that better for the study of life than having them being just a
tiny,
insignificant offshoot of the Archosauromorpha like many here are trying
to
make birds?
That's "assuming". Some recent studies (which are far from universally
accepted) suggest that the anapsid condition in turtles is secondarily
derived and their closest relatives may be within Diapsida - I suggest that
is what is being referred to here, not a suggestion that all anapsids (eg
pareiasaurs) be moved into Archosauromorpha.
--
Ronald I. Orenstein Phone: (905) 820-7886
International Wildlife Coalition Fax/Modem: (905) 569-0116
1825 Shady Creek Court
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5L 3W2 mailto:ornstn@home.com