[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Yanornis NOT an enantiornithine!
Michael A. Turton wrote:
Here is a quickie of the abstract, after the sentences you did (there
are a couple of technical terms I don't know:
"These two types of birds are more advanced than Liaoning neornithes,
but
closer to [Zhaoyang and Songling bird].
_Chaoyangia_ and _Songlingornis_, I would guess, both of which are regarded
as basal Ornithurae (Chaoyangiformes).
Compared with other Cretaceous
birds, such as Confuciornis, Liaoxi and Shifan,
_Confuciusornis_, _Liaoxiornis_.. but "Shifan"? - is this _Jibeinia_?
[snip] same line
as modern birds (including neornithes radiation and distribution), it is
obvious that they are all different than [Shizhu Bird] ,
"Shizhu Bird"? - no idea at all what this is.
Looks like Mesozoic birds are now coming out of the woodwork. Bring 'em on!
Tim
------------------------------------------------------------
Timothy J. Williams
USDA/ARS Researcher
Agronomy Hall
Iowa State University
Ames IA 50014
Phone: 515 294 9233
Fax: 515 294 3163
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com