Re: Speculative dino species

["Stacey Burgess" <pheonix2000@hotmail.com>]

I see nothing wrong with it and actuallly find it interesting (those armless 
tyrannosaurids were odd) However I think that the fact that the animals ARE 
speculative always should be pointed out( it was in that book).

-----------------------
Stacey Burgess
<a href= http://www.corona_borealis.homestead.com/home.html>Corona 
Borealis</a>
<a href= http://www.paleozone.homestead.com/home.html>Paleozone</a>




----Original Message Follows----
From: "Srnka, Christopher P." <Srnka.Christopher@mayo.edu>
Reply-To: Srnka.Christopher@mayo.edu
To: "'dinosaur@usc.edu'" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Speculative dino species
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 12:38:38 -0500


I really enjoyed seeing some of Greg Paul's guesses about what dinosaur
evolution might have produced in the Scientific American Book of Dinosaurs;
just wondering how other feel about this, depicting species that never
existed (but might have, if given the chance) or even depicting speculative
"missing links" ( something of a misnomer, i know).

Christopher Srnka
Illustrator * Mayo Medical Ventures * 8-1605


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp