[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: RUNNING STEGOSAURS
In a message dated 7/17/01 3:04:11 PM EST, Tetanurae@aol.com writes:
<< I need to interject here.... Excellent runners compared to what? The
most
basal stegosaurs I am aware of are Huayangosaurus and Dacentrurus, both of
which were probably quite a bit less spritely than Stegosaurus itself.
Dacentrurus was positively massive, probably bigger than Stegosaurus itself.
All non-stegosaurin stegosaurids (Stegosaurini = Stegosaurus, Wuerhosaurus,
and Monkonosaurus [no, the name is not official, just something I made up to
facilitate discussion]) were even further slowed by the presence of
sometimes
massive shoulder spines, and thicker plates. >>
I'm not talking about what stegosaurs >became<, I'm talking about their
Triassic to Early Jurassic forms, as yet undiscovered, which (even if they
were early thyreophorans, which I am not convinced that they were) were still
good cursors somewhat resembling Scutellosaurus.
Otherwise, explain why graviportal forms would lose digit >and< metatarsal I
in the hind foot. Didn't happen in any other graviportal dinosaur group, why
in stegosaurs?