[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: The Hunchback of the Mid-Cretaceous
--- "Jaime A. Headden" <qilongia@yahoo.com>
> Suffice it to say, the very arangement of the spines, the lack
>of any distal expansion or areas for tendonous attachment
>besides the cranial and caudal sulci on the neural spines
>themselves (between the paired pre- and post- spinozygapophyseal
>laminae), suggesting the lack of a good deal of muscular support
>there. The back was probably quite rigid, in that the vertebrae
>are midly opisthocoelous to platycoelous, which restricts motion
>to some degree.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Really?
On the archives I kept getting referenced to them being strongly opisthoceolus.
When did this end and the platycoelus replacements start?
And how likely is the hypothesis that _Spinosaurus_ could open its sail like a
Japanese fan (though not *half* as flexible as that)?
Jura
==
The Reptipage at: http://reptilis.net
Because reptiles are just cooler.
_____________________________________________________________
Visit http://freeservers.com to get a FREE Web site with a personalized domain
and FREE Web-based e-mail.