[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Rauhut's Thesis

To: Mickey Mortimer <Mickey_Mortimer11@msn.com>
Subject: Re: Rauhut's Thesis
From: "T. Mike Keesey" <tmk@dinosauricon.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 18:43:28 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: -Dinosaur Mailing List- <dinosaur@usc.edu>
In-reply-to: <010b01c10883$8b5c3b20$32020f3f@hppav>
Reply-to: tmk@dinosauricon.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

I also wanted to ask (sorry if it was addressed and I missed it) whether
_Dilophosaurus sinensis_ was considered.

_____________________________________________________________________________
T. MICHAEL KEESEY
 Home Page               <http://dinosauricon.com/keesey>
  The Dinosauricon        <http://dinosauricon.com>
   personal                <keesey@bigfoot.com> --> <tmk@dinosauricon.com>
    Dinosauricon-related    <dinosaur@dinosauricon.com>
     AOL Instant Messenger   <Ric Blayze>
      ICQ                     <77314901>
       Yahoo! Messenger        <Mighty Odinn>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rauhut's Thesis
  - From: "Mickey Mortimer" <Mickey_Mortimer11@msn.com>

References:
- Re: Rauhut's Thesis
  - From: "Mickey Mortimer" <Mickey_Mortimer11@msn.com>

Prev by Date: The Great Dinosaur Debate??? (was Re: Phil Currie celebration,...)
Next by Date: Re: Dinosaurs of the Air
Previous by thread: Re: Rauhut's Thesis
Next by thread: Re: Rauhut's Thesis
Indexes: