Really good question... _give me more
fossils!!!_ :-)
Leathery? Hah. Pterosaur wings weren't bat
wings, they were reinforced by those famous "aktinofibrils" and therefore quite
stiff.
Bingo IMHO, that indeed seems to be the way
the evolution works.
I don't completely understand this...
anyway, there probably were no suitable empty niches at that time, I'd
say.
BTW, I've thought once more about the
hypothesis that mammals replaced dinosaurs from the bottom up... Dinosaurs never
got into certain niches for small animals because they had been filled all the
time by synapsids. Examples (in decreasing order of support):
- the rodent niche (dicynodonts?,
tritylodontids, haramiyids, multituberculates, gondwanatheres, no
dinos);
- various arboreal niches (probably
arboreal mammals, like *Henkelotherium*, are known, but so far no dinos;
*Microraptor*, well... :-| needless to say, birds got into the
trees)
- The Really Small Insectivore niche (but
neck vertebrae of a 20 cm long coelophysoid have long been known from Nova
Scotia, and birds got into that niche);
- the platypus niche (occupied by
platypuses since the Early Cretaceous).
But AFAIK no suspicious increase in size is
known from end-Cretaceous mammals (the largest Mesozoic mammals I know are from
the Early Cretaceous, *Gobiconodon* [40 cm] and *Kollikodon* [?1 m]), neither
did mammals appear in niches that had so far been held by dinos.
I strongly suspect there are people Out
There who know more about Mesozoic mammals...
|